Content by Category
.NET 1.x
.NET 2.0
.NET 3.0
.NET 3.5
.NET 4.0
.NET Assemblies
.NET Framework
.NET Getting Started
Accessibility
ADO.NET
Advertorials
Agile Development
AJAX
Architecture
ASP.NET
ASP.NET MVC
ASP.NET WebForms
B2B (Business Integration)
BizTalk
Book Excerpts
Build and Deploy
C#
C++
Code Contracts
CODE on the Road!
COM+
Community
Conferences
Continuous Integration
Crystal Reports
CSLA.NET
CSS
Data
Design Patterns
Development Process
Display Technologies
Distributed Computing
DotNetNuke
DSL
Dynamic Programming
Editorials
Enterprise Services ("COM+")
Entity Framework
Events
Expression Blend
F#
Fox to Fox
Frameworks
Functional Programming
Graphics
Internet Explorer 8.0
Interviews
iPhone
Java
Java Script
jQuery
LINQ
Linux
Mac OS X
MDX
Microsoft Application Blocks
Microsoft Business Rules Framework
Microsoft Expression
Microsoft Office
Mobile Development
Mobile PC
Mono
Network
NHibernate
Object Oriented Development
Open Source
Opinion
Opinions
Oracle
ORM
Other Languages
Parallel Programming
Patterns
Podcasts
Post Mortem
PowerPoint
Print/Output
Product News
Product Reviews
Project Management
Python
Q&A
Reporting Services
REST
RIA Services
Ruby
Search
Security
Services
SharePoint
Silverlight
SOA
Social Networks
Software & Law
Software Business
Source Control
Speech-Enabled Applications
SQL Server
SQL Server 2000
SQL Server 2005
SQL Server 2008
SQL Server CE/AnyWhere/Mobile/Compact
Subversion
Sync Framework
Tablet PC
TDD
Team System
Techniques
Testing and Quality Control
Tips
UI Design
UML
User Groups
VB Script
VB.NET
VFP and .NET
VFP and SQL Server
Virtual Earth
Vista
Visual Basic
Visual Basic 6 (and older)
Visual FoxPro
Visual Studio .NET
Visual Studio 2005
Visual Studio 2008
Visual Studio 2010
Visual Studio Tools for Office
VSX
WCF
Web Development (general)
Web Services
WF
Whitepapers
Windows 7
Windows Azure
Windows Live
Windows Server
Windows Vista
WinForms
Workflow
WPF
XAML
XML
XNA
XSLT



CODE Training


 


TOWER 48

Reader rating:
Click here to read 4 comments about this article.
Article source: CoDe (2007 - May/Jun)


Article Pages:  1  2 3 4 5 - Next >


Enterprise Application Integration with Microsoft BizTalk Server 2006-Part 1

Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) is a collection of architectural principles combined to integrate new and existing applications both within the enterprise and in business to business or partner integration scenarios. This article (Part 1) will provide a conceptual overview of BizTalk Server 2006 and how it serves to address the problem domain common in the EAI space. In Part 2, I’ll introduce a business case for implementing an online ordering and fulfillment system and provide a step-by-step example of how to implement a solution that addresses the problem domain.

Over the last 50+ years, a recurring theme in the advancement of software and hardware technology has been the subtle, yet significant reduction in coupling between both hardware and software itself and its constituent artifacts. From the earliest electro-mechanical machines (with the “code” embedded in the hardware itself) to general purpose systems and microcomputers, each significant advancement in technology has ushered with it a reduction in interdependencies between dependant parts.

"
Today, complex business process can be exposed via service endpoints so that their service interfaces can be easily leveraged in a location-transparent manner.
"

For example, assembly languages moved the industry beyond embedding code within moving sprockets and dials. Procedural languages offered an alternative to programming directly against specific hardware. Object-oriented programming introduced an even brighter future in which composition and behavior of a program could be modularized into reusable building blocks that could be compiled and hosted on any machine provided it was built on the same processor architecture. Decades of use have found even this level of flexibility to be too restrictive because intimate, white-box re-use is required to leverage these objects, in a sense coupling the client to the underlying implementation.

Newer, component-oriented technologies such as COM, COM+ and .NET were introduced to address some of these challenges, bringing the concept of black-box reuse, in which clients are bound to objects almost exclusively via interfaces or contracts. When communicating using a predefined interface or contract, objects take the form of components, which are really just more sophisticated objects. With components, objects can communicate within the same application or across machine or process boundaries. However, even though components can communicate with other objects/components across process boundaries with greatly reduced coupling, the protocols, platforms, and technologies are largely proprietary, requiring that objects communicate within vendor-specific offerings. That said, components are a necessary and important evolution within software engineering and have laid the foundation for more recent developments (i.e., services).

Since the advent of component technologies, the Internet has provided unprecedented levels of interconnectivity between systems and networks, accelerating globalization at an alarming rate. Demands for connectivity require further decoupling from vendor-specific frameworks and pseudo-protocols. Through the standardization of data transfer objects with XML, the concepts of object and component orientation set the foundation for services; the latest generation of which has been popularized by SOAP XML Web services. Using a common, textual way to represent data while providing a vendor-neutral manner of moving this data between memory and wire protocols, components, or services can now not only communicate across processes, but messaging through public (Internet) and private (intranet and extranet) networks worldwide is a reality that is quite tenable today.

SOAP, XML, and Web services are now the mainstays of modern services, and many organizations and vendors are under significant pressure to put this newfound level of connectivity and interoperability to work in an effort to maximize returns on existing and future investments. As such, applications can no longer be thought of as islands unto themselves. Although SOAP Web services solve some problems, using them introduces some new challenges as a result.

Developers today face the daunting task of integrating a myriad of applications using this nascent technology for which standards are continuously emerging. Within many organizations, the demands for integrating new and legacy applications has resulted in integration spaghetti, the unfortunate result of having to deal with older legacy protocols and a lack of experience, design, and architecture for braving this new frontier of application integration.

Not only do organizations need to integrate new and existing applications, but those organizations must consider and address goals above and beyond interoperability such as availability, reliability, scalability, performance, and security (to name a few). Due to the disconnected nature of HTTP, the protocol on which SOAP XML Web services ride, delivering on these design goals is not trivial and introduces a host of new problems facing developers and architects. In addition, organizations have made significant investments in legacy applications (for which it would be too expensive or impractical to implement contemporary interfaces) that rely on tried and true protocols such as FTP and SMTP along with flat-file formats that these same organizations must somehow continue to leverage within new integration scenarios. These protocols and formats are prevalent in many systems, and today, the applications that employ them demand the same levels of interconnectivity as their contemporaries.

Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) is the process and supporting architecture for linking distributed systems (both legacy and new) together within the enterprise and in business to business or partner integration scenarios. By integrating existing investments with new products, organizations can maximize the longevity of their intellectual property and return on investment.

&

By: Rick Garibay

With over 10 years experience delivering solutions on the Microsoft platform in various industry sectors, Rick is a Principal Consultant and Practice Lead with the Connected Systems Development Practice at Neudesic.

Rick focuses on streamlining business processes while enhancing the productivity of developers by combining modern, iterative software engineering methodologies with technologies such as Microsoft .NET, Windows Communication Foundation and BizTalk Server to deliver business value and drive revenue while reducing operational costs.

Rick is an active speaker and member of the greater Phoenix .NET community and is the President and Co-Founder of the Phoenix Connected Systems User Group. Most recently, Rick delivered a presentation at the 2009 Microsoft SOA and Business Process Conference in Redmond, WA.

Rick’s recent publications include “Building Services for Deployment in Transiently Connected Networks with Windows Communication Foundation” for CODE Magazine as well as “Programming the Microsoft Business Rules Framework” for CODE Magazine and DevX.

Rick has been recognized by Microsoft Corporation for his contributions to the .NET, SOA and Connected Systems space by being awarded the Microsoft Most Valuable Professional designation for Connected Systems.

When not immersed in the work he loves, Rick enjoys spending time with his wife, Christie and two children, Sarah and Ricky.

Contact Rick at http://www.rickgaribay.net/Contact.aspx.

Fast Facts

There is much more to BizTalk Server than messaging and orchestration. The Business Rules Engine, Human Workflow Services, Enterprise Single Sign On, and Business Activity Monitoring are each significant components of the product.



Article Pages:  1  2 3 4 5 - Next Page: 'Introducing BizTalk Server 2006' >>

Page 1: Enterprise Application Integration with Microsoft BizTalk Server 2006-Part 1
Page 2: Introducing BizTalk Server 2006
Page 3: Adapters and Pipelines
Page 4: Introducing the Orchestration Engine
Page 5: Overview of the Visual Studio 2005 BizTalk Project System

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor      Outstanding

Tell us why you rated the content this way. (optional)

Average rating:
2.8 out of 5

11 people have rated this article.

      Tower 48

 

CODE TRAINING