Content by Category
.NET 1.x
.NET 2.0
.NET 3.0
.NET 3.5
.NET 4.0
.NET Assemblies
.NET Framework
.NET Getting Started
Accessibility
ADO.NET
Advertorials
Agile Development
AJAX
Architecture
ASP.NET
ASP.NET MVC
ASP.NET WebForms
Azure
B2B (Business Integration)
Bing
BizTalk
Book Excerpts
Build and Deploy
C#
C++
ClickOnce
Cloud Computing
Code Contracts
CODE on the Road!
COM+
Community
Conferences
Continuous Integration
Crystal Reports
CSLA.NET
CSS
Data
Design Patterns
Development Process
Display Technologies
Distributed Computing
DotNetNuke
DSL
Dynamic Programming
Editorials
Enterprise Services ("COM+")
Entity Framework
Events
Expression Blend
F#
Fox to Fox
Frameworks
Functional Programming
Git
Graphics
Internet Explorer 8.0
Interviews
iPhone
Iron Ruby
Java
Java Script
jQuery
LINQ
Linux
Mac OS X
MDX
Microsoft Application Blocks
Microsoft Business Rules Framework
Microsoft Dynamics
Microsoft Expression
Microsoft Office
Mobile Development
Mobile PC
Mono
MsBuild
Network
NHibernate
Object Oriented Development
Open Source
Opinion
Opinions
Oracle
ORM
Other Languages
Parallel Programming
Patterns
Podcasts
Post Mortem
PowerPoint
Print/Output
Product News
Product Reviews
Project Management
Python
Q&A
Rails
Rake
Reporting Services
REST
RIA Services
Ruby
Ruby on Rails
Search
Security
Services
SharePoint
Silverlight
SOA
Social Networks
Software & Law
Software Business
Source Control
Speech-Enabled Applications
SQL Server
SQL Server 2000
SQL Server 2005
SQL Server 2008
SQL Server CE/AnyWhere/Mobile/Compact
Subversion
Sync Framework
Tablet PC
TDD
Team System
Techniques
Testing and Quality Control
Tips
UI Design
UML
User Groups
VB Script
VB.NET
Version Control
VFP and .NET
VFP and SQL Server
Virtual Earth
Vista
Visual Basic
Visual Basic 6 (and older)
Visual FoxPro
Visual Studio .NET
Visual Studio 2005
Visual Studio 2008
Visual Studio 2010
Visual Studio Tools for Office
VSX
WCF
Web Development (general)
Web Services
WF
Whitepapers
Windows 7
Windows Azure
Windows Live
Windows Server
Windows Vista
WinForms
Workflow
WPF
XAML
XML
XNA
XSLT



DevConnections


 


DevLink

Reader rating:
Click here to read 7 comments about this article.
Article source: CoDe (2004 - September/October)

Die VSS Die!


Jonathan D Goodyear

I tried to come up with a clever analogy to start off this column, but to be honest, I couldn't think of anything appropriate. So I'm just going to come out and say it. Visual Source Safe is a terrible product. I know it, you know it, and Microsoft knows it. Everybody knows it. Heck, it's so bad that Microsoft doesn't even use it for its own internal development. Why? Because VSS couldn't handle it (from a repository size or a user base size perspective).

So why has Microsoft kept it around for so long? After all, at the PDC in San Diego this year, Microsoft announced a fabulous new array of software design and collaboration applications, collectively referred to as Visual Studio 2005 Team System (formerly code named Whitehorse) [1]. Part of that system is a source code version control repository that has been built from the ground up around SQL Server (as it should be). Closely integrated with the source code repository system is a work item tracking application that is able to keep track of bugs, feature requests, risks, and other related project artifacts.

There are a host of other parts to Team System that have to do with the design and deployment analysis of .NET applications, but let's just forget about those for a moment. Why in the world would Microsoft not just give everybody access to a scaled down version of their new source code version control repository and work item tracking application, instead of making smaller development operations that won't be able to afford (or don't want to expend the effort) to implement Team System? It makes no sense to me.

Instead of just tanking VSS and providing an upgrade tool to their new version control system (which I'm sure will be built, if it hasn't already been for those that do purchase Team System), Microsoft is simply branding pretty much the same application as Visual Source Safe 2005 (instead of something more fitting, like Visual Source Safe 6.0zzz, which is about the impression I get from it). Sure, there are some improvements to things like maximum repository size and remote access speed, but in the case of remote access speed, many developers have already found a solution in SourceOffSite by SourceGear. VSS 2005 is just new wrapping paper on the same disappointing product.

The only compelling improvement that I can see is that Microsoft will introduce a .NET managed API to manipulate VSS 2005 so that developers can achieve better build automation. I can definitely appreciate this improvement, but why not get everybody on the same footing with a version control system that is built on the incomparable SQL Server database and also includes work item tracking to boot? Does it make sense to prolong the support nightmare of VSS, in addition to adding a second product that needs to be supported? A better option would be to put VSS on a five-year support expiration timer now.

Perhaps I'm making a quixotic request that will be seen by Microsoft as impossible to grant. I feel, however, that source code version control and work item tracking are so fundamental to the development process that making developers pay extra for the good quality tools to enable it seems wrong. By all means, Microsoft needs to make their money, but do it by selling the other parts of Visual Studio 2005 Team System, like the class and system designers that only true enterprise development operations need (and can afford). I think that Microsoft should even offer single-user licenses to the SQL Server source code version control software to developers using the Express versions of the Visual Studio IDEs (though it wouldn't be integrated), similar to what SourceGear has done with its Vault product [2].

If Microsoft fosters quality software development processes using ubiquitous tools (in the Microsoft realm), it will pay dividends going forward in both good will and developer preference and desire for the more expensive premium parts of Team System. Now that Microsoft has an alternative to Visual Source Safe, they would be well served to let VSS ride off into the sunset, never to be heard from again.

References:

[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/teamsystem/default.aspx

[2] http://www.sourcegear.com/vault/


How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor      Outstanding

Tell us why you rated the content this way. (optional)

Average rating:
4.5 out of 5

50 people have rated this article.

      CODE TRAINING

 

iPhone iPad Developers Conference